User Tools

Site Tools


basic_principles

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
basic_principles [2018/10/28 00:21]
andries
basic_principles [2018/11/10 22:29]
andries [6. Use of synonyms, phrases and inverse phrases]
Line 10: Line 10:
 ====== 1. Expression of ideas by relations ====== ====== 1. Expression of ideas by relations ======
  
-A core principle of the Gellish language is the observation that any idea can be expressed as a collection of one or more binary relations, being relations between two objects. This is the ORO principle: the Object-Relation_type-Object principle (where '​Object'​ is interpreted in its widest sense). That principle is supported by the observation that complex ideas can be expressed as collections of binary relations, while adopting ​that complex ​idea is an object ​in its own right. For example, activities and processes are '​objects'​ that are interactions between multiple objects, whereas ​they can be modeled by a collection of binary involvement relations, each of which expresses the way in which an object ​is involved in the activity or process. \\+A core principle of the Gellish language is the observation that any idea can be expressed as a collection of one or more binary relations, being relations between two objects. This is the ORO principle: the Object-Relation_type-Object principle (where '​Object'​ is interpreted in its widest sense). That principle is supported by the observation that simple as well as complex ideas can be expressed as collections of binary relations, while taking into account ​that complex ​ideas are objects ​in their own right. For example, activities and processes are '​objects'​ that are interactions between multiple objects, whereas ​those interactions ​can be modeled by a collection of binary involvement relations, each of which expresses ​the role that an object plays, or the way in which it is involvedin the activity or process. \\
 Thus expressing information in Gellish begins with chopping the information in binary relations, each relating two objects, and selecting the appropriate kind of relation.\\ Thus expressing information in Gellish begins with chopping the information in binary relations, each relating two objects, and selecting the appropriate kind of relation.\\
 Examples are:\\ Examples are:\\
Line 18: Line 18:
 |Paris |is classified as a| city|\\ |Paris |is classified as a| city|\\
  
-There are a large number of such standard kinds of relations defined in the Gellish language. Those kinds of relations form the basic grammar of Gellish and the fact that they are standardized make that software can build on their meaning, which makes the language computer interpretable and system independent. The standard kinds of relations are defined in the [[:Gellish English Dictionary]],​ together with the other dictionary concepts and terms. The number of kinds of relations and other concepts is not limited to the current dictionary, because the [[:Gellish Modeling Methodology]] includes a specification of how the dictionary can be extended with additional concepts and relation types. For example, if the Eiffel tower or Paris or an appropriate relation type would not yet exist in the Gellish English Dictionary, then they can be added in a Domain Dictionary or as proprietary extensions. All the Gellish expressions can be stored and exchanged using the standard [[:Gellish Databases|Gellish Expression]] format.+Searching for the proper kinds of relations in the various expressions implies searching the [[:Gellish English Dictionary|Gellish Dictionary]] for kinds of relations and their subtypes and the phrases by which they are denoted. Therefore it is advisable that users shall have access to a tool that enables searching the Dictionary. ​There are a large number of standard kinds of relations defined in the Gellish language. Those kinds of relations form the basic grammar of Gellish and the fact that they are standardized make that software can build on their meaning. This makes the language computer interpretable and system independent ​and it enables making ​the software reusable  
 +The number of kinds of relations and other concepts is not limited to the current dictionary, because the [[:Gellish Modeling Methodology]] includes a specification of how the dictionary can be extended with additional concepts and relation types. For example, if the Eiffel tower or Paris or an appropriate relation type would not yet exist in the Gellish English Dictionary, then they can be added in a Domain Dictionary or as proprietary extensions. All the Gellish expressions can be stored and exchanged using the standard [[:Gellish Databases|Gellish Expression]] format.
  
 Furthermore,​ it is recognized that in a binary relation each of the related objects plays a particular role of a particular kind. Therefore, an extended expression of a fact in Gellish includes those (kinds of) roles and thus becomes: Object-First_role-Relation_type-Second_role-Object. For example, the fact that ‘the Eiffel tower is located in Paris’ is expressed as relation between the Eiffel tower and Paris, which relation is classified by the standard Gellish relation type called <is located in>. Furthermore,​ the Eiffel tower plays the role of //located// and Paris plays the role of //​location//​ in that relation.\\ Furthermore,​ it is recognized that in a binary relation each of the related objects plays a particular role of a particular kind. Therefore, an extended expression of a fact in Gellish includes those (kinds of) roles and thus becomes: Object-First_role-Relation_type-Second_role-Object. For example, the fact that ‘the Eiffel tower is located in Paris’ is expressed as relation between the Eiffel tower and Paris, which relation is classified by the standard Gellish relation type called <is located in>. Furthermore,​ the Eiffel tower plays the role of //located// and Paris plays the role of //​location//​ in that relation.\\
Line 47: Line 48:
 ====== 4. Standard data structure: the Gellish Expression format ====== ====== 4. Standard data structure: the Gellish Expression format ======
  
-The structure of Gellish expressions (its syntax) is intended to enable the expression of ideas of any kind. The development process of various ISO standards has revealed ​that there appears to be a generic structure that is suitable for expressing any kind of ideaThus, every expression has basically the same generic structure, although there are a large number of optional elements. Furthermore,​ it appears to be possible to model that structure in a single table. As a result, the Gellish Expression format consists of only one precisely defined table. The core of the structure is illustrated by the examples in Table 1.+The structure of Gellish expressions (its syntax) is intended to enable the expression of ideas of any kind. It was discovered ​that it is possible to express ideas as collections of binary relations, whereas such relations follows always a basic semantic pattern. As a consequence ​there appears to be a generic structure that is suitable for expressing ​ideas of any kind. This means that every expression has basically the same generic structure, although there are a large number of optional elements ​within that structure. Furthermore,​ it appears to be possible to model that structure in a single table with a number of optional columns. As a result, the Gellish Expression format consists of only one precisely defined table. The core of the structure ​of that table is illustrated by the examples in Table 1.
  
 ^ //Name of left hand object//^ //Name of the kind of relation//^ //Role of the right hand object//^ //Name of right hand object//^ //Unit of measure//^ ^ //Name of left hand object//^ //Name of the kind of relation//^ //Role of the right hand object//^ //Name of right hand object//^ //Unit of measure//^
Line 77: Line 78:
 ====== 5. Use of standardized kinds of relations ====== ====== 5. Use of standardized kinds of relations ======
  
-The various kinds of relationships are standardized in the Gellish Dictionary and the kinds of relations are the core elements that determine the expression power of the formal language. Expression in Gellish are only correct Gellish expressions if the use kinds of relations that are selected from the Gellish Taxonomic Dictionary. The kinds of relations form a specialization hierarchy (subtype-supertype hierarchy) of kinds of relations to ensure consistency of the language. That hierarchy enables that software can also search for expressions that use more specialized subtypes of kinds of relations. For example, software can automatically search for things that are connected to each other by any kind of connection, but it can also search for welded connections only. The kinds of relations are further ​defined in the dictionary (ontology) by the kinds of roles that they require. Those roles are also explicitly defined and arranged in a specialization hierarchy that is compliant with the hierarchy of the kinds of relations. Finally it is defined which kind of objects can play roles of those kinds, whereas those role players are also defined and arranged in a specialization hierarchy. Together these definitions and hierarchies enable Gellish powered software to verify the correctness ​of Gellish expressions ​and the consistency of the use of the language and it enables the application of logic reasoning during the search to answer questions and queries. \\+The various kinds of relationships are standardized in the Gellish Dictionary and the kinds of relations are the core elements that determine the expression power of the formal language. Expression in Gellish are only correct Gellish expressions if they use kinds of relations that are selected from the Gellish Taxonomic Dictionary. The kinds of relations form a specialization hierarchy (subtype-supertype hierarchy) of kinds of relations to ensure consistency of the language. That hierarchy enables that software can also search for expressions that use more specialized subtypes of kinds of relations ​for expressing meanings more precisely. For example, software can automatically search for things that are connected to each other by any kind of connection, but it can also search for welded connections only. The kinds of relations are defined ​further ​in the dictionary (ontology) by the specification of the kinds of roles that they require. Those roles are also explicitly defined and arranged in a specialization hierarchy that is compliant with the hierarchy of the kinds of relations. Finally it is defined which kind of objects can play roles of those kinds, whereas those role players are also defined and arranged in a specialization hierarchy. Together these definitions and hierarchies enable Gellish powered software to verify the use of kinds of relations in Gellish expressions ​is consistent with the definition ​of the formal ​language and it enables the application of logic reasoning during the search to answer questions and queries. \\
 Some examples of important binary kinds of relations with rather trivial kinds of roles are: Some examples of important binary kinds of relations with rather trivial kinds of roles are:
   * A composition relationship,​ with the roles ‘part’ and ‘whole’.   * A composition relationship,​ with the roles ‘part’ and ‘whole’.
Line 113: Line 114:
 ====== 6. Use of synonyms, phrases and inverse phrases ====== ====== 6. Use of synonyms, phrases and inverse phrases ======
  
-Gellish ​enables the definition of synonyms, abbreviations,​ codes, etc. for names of concepts as well as for names of kinds of relationships. Each term and each alias is defined to belong to the vocabulary of either '​international',​ being the international community, or to a natural language and within that to a 'language community' ​such as a discipline, a standard or an organization. ​Standard synonyms ​are defined in the Gellish Dictionarybut users can define their own terminology as alias that is specific for and the preferred ​term for their organization. ​This means that their organization ​is specified as the language community where the term has its base. The same holds for kinds of relations, ​which are denoted by natural language ​phrases, such as the phrases in the column 'name of kind of relation'​ in Table 3. \\ +The Gellish ​dictionary contains terms as well as synonyms, abbreviations,​ codes, etc. for names of concepts as well as for names of kinds of relationships. Each term and each alias is defined to belong to the vocabulary of a natural language and within that to a **language community** such as a discipline, a standard or a particular ​organization. ​A special '​language'​ is called '​international',​ being reserved for terms that are used internationallysuch as units of measure, chemical formulas, codes, etc. Users can define their own terminology as aliases ​that are preferred ​terms for their organization. ​In the latter case the organization ​should be specified as the 'language community' ​where the term has its base. \\ 
-The way in which synonym phrases are defined for the relation types in the Gellish ​English ​dictionary is illustrated on row 5 in Table 3. Gellish English has also defined inverse Gellish phrases that imply that the left hand and the right hand related objects are inversed. Row 6 of Table 3 shows an example.\\+Kinds of relations ​have namesbut are usually ​denoted by natural language ​**phrases**, such as the phrases in the column 'name of kind of relation'​ in Table 3. Note that the phrases have a particular reading direction, which means that the left hand and the right hand object have different roles in the relation. In order to make expressions in which the left and right hand objects are switched, Gellish also defined **inverse phrases**. Whether a phrase or an inverse phrase is used (with switched related objects) has no impact on the meaning of an expression. Phrases and inverse phrases are aliases for the names of kinds of relations ​ 
 +The way in which the synonym phrases are defined for the relation types in the Gellish dictionary is illustrated on row 5 in Table 3. Row 6 of Table 3 shows an example ​of the definition of an inverse phrase for denoting the kind of relation with the name .\\
 Translations can be defined in the same way as aliases, but for the definition of bulk translations,​ the Gellish Expression format allows for additional columns with special IDs that are reserved for terms in a specified language. Translations can be defined in the same way as aliases, but for the definition of bulk translations,​ the Gellish Expression format allows for additional columns with special IDs that are reserved for terms in a specified language.
  
basic_principles.txt · Last modified: 2018/11/10 22:32 by andries